On Track to Tomorrow's Carriers
The carrier of tomorrow.
What will it look like?
What will its capabilities
be? How will we modify
today’s carriers to take advantage of
the technology breakthroughs which
are sure to happen during the ship’s
40- to 50-year life span? Since 1993,
the Navy has been developing a
comprehensive plan to modernize
our aircraft carrier force for the
next century. An important feature
of this strategy is a dual-track
approach that will modernize the
past and transition to the future
while simultaneously maintaining
essential capabilities and force
structure. The first element of this
strategy is the procurement of the
tenth and final Nimitz-class carrier,
CVN 77, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2002.
Scheduled for commissioning in
2008, CVN 77 will replace a 47-
year-old Kitty Hawk class conven-tional
carrier. She also will be a
transition ship, incorporating new
technologies that result from carrier
research and development (R&D)
efforts currently under way.
The experience gained with CVN
77 will lay the foundation for the
second element of our dual-track
strategy—the design of a new class
of aircraft carriers. Construction of
the first ship of the new class, now
referred to as CVX, is scheduled to
begin in FY 2006. The CVX will
retain the core capabilities resident
in our carriers today, but will also
feature improved characteristics in
selected areas, such as launch and
recovery equipment; flight deck lay-out;
Command, Control, Communi-cations,
Computers and Intelligence
(C 4 I); and survivability. And,
crucially, the ship will incorporate
features that make it more affordable
to operate.
Together, these two programs
will ensure that the Navy preserves
a modern, capable carrier force
which meets the requirements of
our war-fighting commanders and
provides enduring military value for
the taxpayers’ dollars. The
dual-track strategy will enable us to
transition from the highly successful—
but 1960s-vintage–Nimitz
design to one specifically designed
to the operational mandates of the
21st century.
Shaping the Strategy
If past experience is any guide,
the “average” Nimitz-class carrier
will make 25 overseas deployments,
respond to over 20 major interna-tional
crises, and see action in sever-al
regional conflicts over its nominal
life span. While the Nimitz class
continues to meet our security
requirements very well, major
changes in threats, missions, tech-nology
and budgets call for a review
of fundamental assumptions. The
basic principles and core capabilities
of sea-based aviation—its value and
role in providing peacetime pres-ence,
response to crises and winning
regional wars—will endure, but we
must review how we fulfill these
principles, including the design of
these aviation sea bases. The
Defense Department’s 1993
Bottom-Up Review, which directed
the Navy to evaluate “a full range of
sea-based platforms to project air
power and meet our military needs
in the period 2020 and beyond,” pro-
vided us with the opportunity to
develop what eventually became our
dual-track strategy.
The key threads in the strategy as
it has evolved are risk assessment
and balancing, ascertaining the
remaining economical service lives
of our older ships, and deciding
when we will have to add new ships
to the fleet in order to maintain force
structure and combat capability.
These, in turn, depend upon opera-tional
tasking, the funding available
for R&D, new construction and
upgrades, acquisition strategy, and
the state of the carrier industrial
base. They also depend on develop-ments
in existing and prospective
aircraft programs, since individual
carriers must have the ability to
accommodate current and projected
air wings, as well as on the output of
the Joint Strike Fighter and other
future aircraft programs.
Managing risk also means weigh-ing
near-term force structure with
longer term war-fighting capability.
Up until 1996, there had been no
significant carrier-related R&D for
more than 30 years. Consequently,
the CVX design, and the technology
that would make it feasible at a rea-sonable
cost, will not be immediate-ly
available. And, yet, we still need a
new-construction carrier to replace
our last Kitty Hawk-class
conventional carrier as she reaches the end
of her service life in the first decade
of the next century.
Hence, CVN 77 will be a critical
force-structure bridge, particularly if
the Navy is to maintain our 11+1 car-rier
force structure mandated by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff. Indeed, force-structure
requirements are the most
fundamental “drivers” of the future
carrier equation. Carrier force levels
are based in large part upon the needs
of the regional com-manders
in chief
(CINCs).
The CINCs, whose
areas of responsibility
encompass the three
strategic deployment
“hubs”—the
Mediterranean basin,
Persian Gulf/Indian
Ocean area and the
western Pacific—all
seek a continuous car-rier
presence in their
regions, but filling this
demand would require
a force of at least 14
carriers, a number that
is currently unafford-able.
The Navy is
meeting its global
commitments at pru-dent
risk with a force
of 12 carriers. But this
carrier force is being stretched, so the
replacement program has been struc-tured
to maintain at least 12 of these
critical warships at all times.
Preserving our force structure and
capabilities requires newly construct-ed
carriers. Further extending the ser-vice
lives of existing carriers could
help us meet our current require-ments
but would do little to ensure
that we have a combat- and
cost-effective force in the future.
CVN 77 and the first CVX will
replace two older, less capable carri-ers:
CVN 77 will replace a Kitty
Hawk-class carrier in 2008, while the
first CVX is slated to relieve the 52
year-old Enterprise (CVN 65) in
2013. The Navy has worked to get
the most service out of these older
carriers, conducting a Service Life
Extension Program on the Kitty
Hawk-class ships and a nuclear
Refueling/Complex Overhaul on
Enterprise. These actions have added
more than 15 years to the originally
planned service lives of the older
ships, but as they age further, the cost
of maintaining and modernizing them
will increase significantly.
Finally, risk management also
encompasses the critical carrier
industrial base. We cannot wait too
long for new carrier construction
without incurring major costs in
reconstituting lost shipyard and ven-dor
capabilities and rehiring skilled
personnel. Construction on the ninth
Nimitz-class carrier, Ronald Reagan
(CVN 76), began last year and will
be completed in 2002. Current projections
show that in the structural
trades alone over 2,000 skilled ship-yard
workers would be lost if a hiatus
were to occur between CVN 76’s
completion date and the start date on
CVN 77. Trying to reconstitute this
type of industrial capability is simply
not realistic or fiscally responsible.
Developing the Carrier
Force of Tomorrow
The dual-track strategy represents
another major step forward in the
evolution of aircraft carriers. The
term “evolution” is appropriate,
because programs that promise “revo-lutionary”
improvements in capability
are often accompanied by unaccept-ably
high levels of technological and
fiscal risk. This is especially true
when dealing with a platform as
complex as an aircraft carrier.
Consequently, the dual-track strategy
takes a building-block approach, rely-ing
upon a continuing R&D program
and a series of technology demon-strations.
The end
result will be more
capable systems, more
affordable systems, or
both.
Besides sustaining
force structure, CVN
77 will also play a key
role as a technological
bridge between the
Nimitz class and
CVX. With a modest
R&D effort, CVN 77
will be the most capa-ble,
technologically
advanced ship in the
Nimitz class, and will
utilize some of the
technologies that are
planned for the first
CVX. Incorporating
these key design fea-tures
in CVN 77 could
reduce total ownership
(life cycle, operational and support)
costs by as much as 15 percent. Once
these features are implemented and
evaluated they may also be backfitted
into existing CVNs, thus significantly
reducing the remaining life cycle and
support costs of those ships.
Some of the concepts currently
under consideration include an inte-grated
information system, fiber-optic
backbones, and zonal electrical distri-bution.
Depending on the available
funding, CVN 77 could also be the
test bed for systems such as multi-functional,
embedded antennas which
could replace many of the radar and
other antennas that currently populate
the islands of existing carriers. The
ship could also feature a modified
island structure that makes greater
use of composite materials to manage
the carrier’s radar signature.
The Navy has neither the time nor
the money to introduce major design
changes in CVN 77. Changes in
propulsion, for instance, were ruled
out due to high technical, schedule
and fiscal risks, as well as our current
dependence on steam catapult
technology.
We will apply many of the techni-cal
and operational lessons learned
from CVN 77 to the new CVX class.
Moreover, the CVX design will
incorporate additional innovations
and capabilities. The Navy is pursu-ing
some targeted improvements in
future carrier designs that build upon
the capabilities resident in our current
class of carriers. The CVX Program
Office (PMS 378) has distilled a
number of specific goals from these
broad categories, including:
- Reducing reliance on ship-assisted
launch and recovery.
- Increasing sortie generation
capabilities to match the projected
fast turnaround capabilities of
next-generation aircraft.
- Improving ship survivability
against future threats.
- Improving C 4 I capacity.
- Alleviating topside design con-gestion.
- Achieving a higher degree of
commonality with the Navy’s other
future ships.
- Reducing manpower require-ments.
There may be several ways to
reach these goals. For instance, to
improve the efficiency of flight oper-ations
and aircraft turnaround, the
program office is investigating elec-tromagnetic
and internal combustion
catapults, possibly integrated with
ski-jumps. Other options include
automated weapons selection and
movement to aircraft, and advanced
systems for flight operations manage-ment
encompassing air operations
and launch and recovery control.
As far as increased survivability is
concerned, the significant topside
design changes being examined for
our future carriers and reductions in
other electromagnetic signatures
could make CVX significantly
“quieter.” The ship’s self-defense sys-tems
will be tailored to respond to the
proliferation of antiship missiles and
other threats throughout the world.
Automated battle damage manage-ment
and zonal electrical distribution
will allow a smaller crew to effective-ly
cope with damage while opera-tions
continue.
The CVX team is also examining
many other measures to ensure that
the future carriers are combat- and
cost-effective. It will review all
propulsion alternatives, from
improved nuclear plants to gas tur-bines.
The CVX may also benefit
from “virtual organizations,” where
the crew is linked to other organiza-tions
by state-of-the-art C 4 I systems.
And, recognizing that the new carrier
will have a potential life span of 40
to 50 years, the team is developing a
design that is easily modified to
accept upgrades over the course of
the ship’s service life.
As we move to meet these techni-cal
challenges, however, we must
always keep the affordability of CVX
in mind. The Department of Defense
faces a period of tight budgets into
the foreseeable future, and one of the
key considerations in maintaining the
health of our carrier force is our abili-ty
to buy and operate new ships with-out
breaking the Navy’s shipbuilding
or operations and maintenance bud-gets.
To this end, the Navy plans a
design to reduce life-cycle costs in
the new class by 20 percent.
We have taken some major steps
along the path toward CVX this year.
The program officially entered the
concept exploration phase in late
March when the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and
Technology, Dr. Paul Kaminski,
approved the mission need statement
and the preliminary acquisition plan
for CVX. Additionally, in the FY
1997 budget, Congress appropriated
the first carrier-specific R&D funding
in decades.
For its part, the Navy has initiated a
cost and operational effectiveness
analysis. The first part of this effort
will examine various concepts of oper-ations
for employing sea-based, com-bat
aviation in future conflict scenar-ios.
Among other things, this analysis
will focus on the required size and
composition of future air wings.
We have also convened the CVX
Oversight Group, which meets
monthly to receive briefings on and
provide input to critical, near-term
issues that arise during the analysis.
The group is made up of flag-level
participants who assist the Navy’s
decision-making process as the analy-sis
proceeds through its first year.
Channels are also in place to solic-it
critical fleet input to the future car-rier
acquisition process (see “Ike
Paves the Way for the Future,” p. 44).
Fleet Process Teams convene quarter-ly
on each coast to ensure a contin-ued
exchange of information between
fleet representatives and CVX pro-gram
engineers.
A Dual Track to the
Future
The Navy is addressing a multi-tude
of operational, technical, fiscal
and programmatic issues as it imple-ments
the carrier replacement plan
and program for the 21st century. Our
paramount concern is supporting
CINC requirements for an affordable
and effective carrier presence in their
areas of responsibility, both today
and tomorrow.
The dual-track carrier procurement
strategy ensures that the Navy is
always able to meet our national
security requirements whenever and
wherever we are needed. The strategy
also ensures that we are good stew-ards
of the taxpayers’ money. Using
CVN 77 to leverage its design
changes in support of present and
future carriers is not only smart, it is
clearly in the best interests of dwin-dling
defense budgets.
We are confident that this strategy
will maintain the high-caliber,
high-capability carrier force that the
United States possesses today, and
extend it well into the middle of the
next century.
RAdm. Rittenour heads the Carrier and Air
Station Programs Branch of the Air Warfare
Division in the Office of the Chief of Naval
Operations. Capt. O’Hare is Program Manager,
Aircraft Carrier Program Office, Naval Sea
Systems Command.