PPT Slide
Affordability + Performance Map
Finally the combined perspective of technologies satisfying both affordablity and performance TEOs emerges.
This plot is a sum, in the vertical axis, of the previous two.
A clearer grouping appears to the upper left combining the high scoring technologies from the two segregated perspectives. Examine ‘Tailless’, note that the QFD score here of ~7% is the sum of the affordability score of 2% and the performance score of 5%..
Before the conclusion was drawn that this is a natural grouping of the top 10 technologies, a final perspective was entertained. What was the ratio of QFD performance score divided by investment cost estimate, i.e., “benefit-to-cost” ratio?
Notes: