PPT Slide
Plotted here on the vertical axis are the QFD scores representing the 44 technology’s ability to satisfy just the 11 affordability TEOs and on the horizontal axis the total investment estimates ($M) to reach TRL 6 in 2003. High QFD scores and low investment would be the preference.
What emerges is a suggestion that the top 10 technologies from the QFD scoring are also attractive because relative to the other 34 technologies they do not appear overly costly to reach TRL 6.
Data points that lie on the extremes of a plot like this deserve special attention. Over to the far right is ‘Energy Management System’, is this correct?
Notes: